LinkedIn link click experiment.

LinkedIn link click experiment
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Research at the end of 2021 by Richard van der Blom suggested that the best place to share external links on LinkedIn was directly within the body of shortform posts.

So, I decided to do a short experiment in November and December 2021 to find out how many times links in my posts were actually clicked.

LinkedIn doesn’t provide this data so I had to make sure that links I used during the test would report how many times they were clicked.

I did this through the use of Google UTM parameters, which allowed me to view link-click stats via my Google Analytics account.

The process for doing the experiment is beyond the scope of this article, but you could also track link clicks using a free link-shortening service such as Bitly.

Before running the test, I expected a Clickthrough Rate (CTR) of 5%.

That is, for every 100 views of a post, I expected 5 people to click a link inside that post.

Results.

This was a short test so involved only 13 posts containing links.

Here are the results:

Post Type Views Reactions Comments Clicks CTR
1 Video 798 85 67 0 0.00%
2 Image 3049 52 41 4 0.13%
3 Text 3470 59 51 78 2.25%
4 Text 3739 83 71 127 3.40%
5 Video 828 92 90 0 0.00%
6 Video 1413 141 50 39 2.76%
7 Image 6612 86 140 12 0.18%
8 Image 4749 114 111 8 0.17%
9 Video 473 43 46 14 2.96%
10 Video 790 97 68 0 0.00%
11 Text 2863 58 36 68 2.38%
12 Video 857 80 63 0 0.00%
13 Text 3290 57 60 48 1.46%

CTR = Clickthrough Rate = clicks divided by views

The CTR for text and image posts was 1.42%.

The CTR for video posts excluding #FridayShout posts was 2.86%.

The CTR for #FridayShout video posts was 0%!

Remember that these stats relate to the proportion of people who clicked links within these posts.

Perhaps the percentages would have been slightly higher if the destination of each link was clearer, due to the ugly link shortening that’s introduced when using Google UTM parameters in LinkedIn posts. I’ve talked about link shortening in my article about LinkedIn links.

For these 13 test posts, I got averages of 81 reactions and 69 comments.

Compare that with all posts from the month before, when I got an average of 104 reactions and 83 comments.

Let’s wrap up.

The results were worse than I expected.

For most posts, only between 1% and 3% of viewers clicked a link within each post.

The lesson I’ve learned here is not to expect people to click my links even on posts that appear to perform relatively well.

It’s far better to give people the insight they’re looking for directly within the post rather than expecting them to look at some external source for that content.

More LinkedIn goodies.

Since 2017, I've been building the LinkedIn Learner Lounge to show you how to be more effective on LinkedIn.

And it's all FREE.

LinkedIn Learner Lounge


John Espirian.

John blue green ring small

Buy John a coffee. Like my work? Make a small donation to help support this content

I write relentlessly helpful content for B2B businesses and personal brands so that they get better results from their website and LinkedIn profile.

Listen to 6 chapters of Content DNA (free, no signup).

Like my work? Make a small donation to help support this content.

Espresso: digital caffeine by email.

Tips to improve your web content & LinkedIn presence.
Always under 200 words.

💙 1525 good-looking people aboard. Are you next?
🔐 Yes, privacy assured

Share on social media

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook